Normal Bob

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Normal Bob's Achievements

  1. here are some, tell me if you need more.http://www.childpro.org/ldscases.htm
  2. I don't give a rat's behind about your "pedigree", what I do know is your posting history here. Care to enlighten us as to what percentage of your posts here are even benignly complimentary to the church? I would guess it couldn't be much more than 2-3%. DO you have proof that JS or any other LDS leader had sex with 12 year-olds, or are you simply trying make an invalid point? From what I have read, he may have been sealed to a 14 year-old, but from what I have seen, there is no evidence yet that he had sex with her. It may interest you to know that he was sealed to some men as well, are you implying that he had sex with them as well? You two are some pair. Are you saying that Joseph Smith might have been bisexual? Ewwww!
  3. If that's as grown-up as you get, it's not a serious loss. By the way, let us know when you find any reference to "pedophilia" in my post; that seems to be in your inflamed imagination... You don't think that having sex with a 12 year old falls into the pedophilia category, or just not when discussing people that belong to your religion?
  4. I find it very disturbing that you are defending pedophilia. I don't think I want to talk to you any more. *shudders*
  5. You're welcome. And since you so far haven't brought anything to the table, it's all you'll get until you have a valid point to make. Please, bring one next time you post, it'll be more beneficial to all of us. Back in the olden days, they used to castrate boys so they would have a desirable singing voice. It's okay that they did that back then, because it was a common thing. Just like it isn't reprehensible that many mormons, including Joseph Smith married young girls that were likely pre-menarche.Does that sound about right to you?
  6. Oh, okay. See, I thought it was obvious to anyone who knows anything about world history knows that teens being married and even bearing children during the early- and even late- 19th century was not an uncommon occurance. And in case you guys didn't know, it had been going on for centuries before as well. In fact, I have seen some speculations claiming that it is not out of the realm of possibility the Mary, the mother of Jesus, may not have been much older than 14 or 15 when she gave birth. That being said, and I know how you anti's think, so I will clarify now, that does not in any way justify the practice of teen marriage today. Kids are not ready, for a number of reasons, to enter into that practice today. Were they ready when they practiced those things in earlier centuries? Possibly, I wasn't there then, and neither were you, so it would be hard to judge practices that occurred then by today's standards. The world in general is much different today than it was then, and less emphasis is being placed on preparing young kids for marriage at an early age, if ever, today. The average 14 y/o is not ready for marriage today, while it is not impossible to imagine that in earlier times, young people were ready to make those kinds of commitments. Am I being clear enough for you yet, guys? That was pathetic, but if that's all you've got, I guess that's all we're going to get. Thank you for the effort.
  7. The false quote was to illustrate the intentions of your red herring post. Are you going to back up your assertion or not?
  8. I'd like to hear what the differences are as well.
  9. Is it no wonder? Terri was starved and dehydrated to death. I would think that anyone of us who was tortured the way she was would have lost some mass to our brains along with other organs in the body. I know that I am a lone soldier on this message board about this but I do not believe that Michael¡Çs motives were pure as he and his attorney make him out to be. Not that it matters, but I also believe that Michael belongs in the same category as some other high profile cases i.e. O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson. I am happy that Terri is no longer suffering at the hands of her monster of a ¡Èhusband¡É You don¡Çt have to dispute this, these are my feelings and because they are my feelings it is true for me. May Terri rest in peace. Thanks. Strawberry, You ought to examine your reasoning process. Somehow you equate a legal guardian exercising the rights and responsibilities legally and morally granted to him with a double murderer. That's lugumbios. You don¡Çt have to dispute this, these are my feelings and because they are my feelings it is true for me. I am entitled to my own opinion period. Why is it that you have not piped up in response of one of my posts since that last Terri Shiavo thread? You know how strongly I feel about this yet you seem to rejoice in being an ***********. I can see you reasoning if we were talking about a person that has been left mentally deficient, but we are talking about a person that is brain dead. What is a person without a functioning brain that will never recover? Is it humane to let a person "live" like that?
  10. It seems to me that Terry died ten years ago. All Michael did was pull the plug on the shell that his wife used to live in. I don't think letting a dead person die is a criminal act, but an act of compassion. Or to put it another way, The woman's brain was dead. Only her body was being kept alive. How is that a good thing?
  11. Yes, they are not as worthy to God as you and I are. After all, they belong to the wrong sect of Christianity. Jesus will let them burn in hell for not accepting the right sect of Christianity.They will all burn in hell for not accepting the right Jesus. BURN!